Posted on Leave a comment

FemtoGlow vs AttoGlow: Which Chemiluminescent Substrate is Right for Your Western Blot?

Comparing FemtoGlow and AttoGlow Substrates

Choosing between FemtoGlow HRP substrates and AttoGlow AP substrates depends on your specific Western blotting needs. This comparison guide helps you select the optimal detection system for your research.

FemtoGlow HRP Substrates

Best For:

  • Standard Western blotting protocols
  • High-throughput screening
  • Budget-conscious laboratories
  • ELISA and chemiluminescent immunoassays

Advantages:

  • Fast signal development (1-5 minutes)
  • Compatible with all standard HRP-conjugated antibodies
  • Economical for routine applications
  • Available in single-bottle or two-bottle formats

Sensitivity Range:

Femtogram to picogram detection depending on formulation

AttoGlow AP Substrates

Best For:

  • Ultra-low abundance proteins (attogram detection)
  • Multiplexing experiments
  • Membrane stripping and reprobing
  • Applications requiring extended signal stability

Advantages:

  • Attogram-level sensitivity with enhancer
  • Extended signal plateau (2+ hours)
  • No endogenous peroxidase interference
  • Available in 450nm and 540nm emission variants

Sensitivity Range:

Attogram to femtogram detection with enhancer reagents

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature FemtoGlow (HRP) AttoGlow (AP)
Sensitivity Femtogram Attogram
Signal Duration 30 min – 2 hours 2+ hours
Development Time 1-5 minutes 25-45 minutes
Price Point Economy Premium

Making Your Choice

Choose FemtoGlow if: You need fast, reliable detection for medium-to-high abundance proteins with standard HRP workflows

Choose AttoGlow if: You require maximum sensitivity for rare proteins or plan to strip and reprobe membranes

Order Samples

Not sure which substrate is right for you? Contact us to request trial sizes of both FemtoGlow and AttoGlow substrates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *